The announcement of new academic diplomas may be politically useful in encouraging universities and employers to accept vocational ones. It is less clear how useful academic diplomas will be in advancing education – particularly science education.
The fall-out of similar upheavals – the introduction of combined science GCSEs in 1990 and of AS-levels in Curriculum 2000, had extremely negative consequences for the study of science.
Expanding the diploma programme before it has even started in most schools is typical of this government and mirrors the premature rolling-out of the new GCSE science curricula after just one year of piloting.
In practical terms, the complexity of schools working in consortia with employers to provide 17 qualifications at three levels is mind-boggling.
Science diplomas may encourage a broader science and maths background prior to university, but at the cost of fewer students. Evidence, rather than political motives, should drive decisions about science teaching.
Dr Hilary Leevers, Acting Director
Related resources
CaSE letter to UKRI CEO Prof Sir Ian Chapman
24 February 2026
Following discourse surrounding UKRI’s new funding model and the specific impact of some changes to the STFC, CaSE have written to ask for further clarity on some key areas.
The UK must lower immigration costs for all researchers
11 February 2026
Chancellor’s Davos speech signals tentative steps to remove barriers to skilled immigration, says Daniel Rathbone
What does the post-16 skills white paper mean for research?
23 October 2025
CaSE’s look at the UK Government’s plans for Further and Higher Education in England in the post-16 Education and Skills white paper.
We can tell a better story about immigration and R&D
07 October 2025
Recent work by CaSE shows how supportive voices can talk about immigration for the UK R&D sector in a way that resonates with the public.