CaSE letter on academic diplomas published in TES
02 Nov 2007
The announcement of new academic diplomas may be politically useful in encouraging universities and employers to accept vocational ones. It is less clear how useful academic diplomas will be in advancing education – particularly science education.
The fall-out of similar upheavals – the introduction of combined science GCSEs in 1990 and of AS-levels in Curriculum 2000, had extremely negative consequences for the study of science.
Expanding the diploma programme before it has even started in most schools is typical of this government and mirrors the premature rolling-out of the new GCSE science curricula after just one year of piloting.
In practical terms, the complexity of schools working in consortia with employers to provide 17 qualifications at three levels is mind-boggling.
Science diplomas may encourage a broader science and maths background prior to university, but at the cost of fewer students. Evidence, rather than political motives, should drive decisions about science teaching.
Dr Hilary Leevers, Acting Director

Related resources
On 28th October the Chancellor delivered the Budget. Here CaSE considers the announced measures and what they may mean for UK R&D.
In this submission, we set out why and how curiosity-driven research must be protected, how we can better attract and retain global R&D talent, and how support can be better proved for regional R&D.
Following discourse surrounding UKRI’s new funding model and the specific impact of some changes to the STFC, CaSE have written to ask for further clarity on some key areas.
Chancellor’s Davos speech signals tentative steps to remove barriers to skilled immigration, says Daniel Rathbone