Following consultation with our members, CaSE responded to Lord Stern’s review of the Research Excellence Framework.
CaSE submission to Stern Review of REF 2016
18 Mar 2016
Summary of key points
- Introducing further major change at a time of multiple reforms to the research funding and regulatory environment and to university teaching could be destabilising
- In the short-term, maintain the current structure but build in lessons learnt from the 2014 exercise
- There will be efficiency gains from the sector understanding the REF process and having institutional processes in place to respond
- Peer review provides a robust, transparent and credible basis for assessing outputs and should continue to be the basis of assessment, with metrics providing supplementary input
- Changing staff and output selection by decoupling of individuals from outputs, is the most substantial change proposed that could bring significant benefits and efficiencies
- Introducing small changes that would enable better use of the data from the REF could maximise the benefits of the exercise
- Further technical consultation will enable those with experience of REF2014 to help refine the next REF exercise
Download the full response
DownloadRelated resources
Our 2026 conference allowed people from across the sector and beyond to hear panels of experts discuss the important issues facing UK R&D, and to ask questions to key figures influencing the future of the sector.
CaSE look at the detail of newly published ONS data on UK business expenditure on research and development.
As CaSE turns 40, we are looking ahead and exploring what the future holds for R&D in the UK. Policy Manager Camilla d’Angelo introduces CaSE’s new piece of work on ‘Reimagining R&D’.
Ahead of the upcoming DSIT allocations, CaSE, UUK, and ARMA have joined forces to examine the real impact that financial constraints are having on UK universities and the need to put it on a sustainable footing.