Read CaSE’s response to the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee report on scientific infrastructure.
CaSE submission to the Lords Inquiry into Scientific Infrastructure
23 Nov 2013
Our response considers the questions:
- What role should the Government play in ensuring that there is an effective long-term strategy for meeting future scientific infrastructure needs?
- What impact has removing capital spend from the ring-fenced budget had on investment in scientific infrastructure and should the ring-fenced science budget be redefined to include an element of capital spend?
- If the current funding level is maintained or reduced, what would be the longer term impacts on scientific infrastructure in the UK?
- To what extent do funding structures in the UK help or hinder involvement in EU and international projects, and should the level of UK involvement be improved?
- What impact does publicly funded scientific infrastructure have in terms of supporting innovation and stimulating the UK’s economy?
Download the full response
DownloadRelated resources
Our 2026 conference allowed people from across the sector and beyond to hear panels of experts discuss the important issues facing UK R&D, and to ask questions to key figures influencing the future of the sector.
CaSE look at the detail of newly published ONS data on UK business expenditure on research and development.
As CaSE turns 40, we are looking ahead and exploring what the future holds for R&D in the UK. Policy Manager Camilla d’Angelo introduces CaSE’s new piece of work on ‘Reimagining R&D’.
Ahead of the upcoming DSIT allocations, CaSE, UUK, and ARMA have joined forces to examine the real impact that financial constraints are having on UK universities and the need to put it on a sustainable footing.