Read CaSE’s response to the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee report on scientific infrastructure.
CaSE submission to the Lords Inquiry into Scientific Infrastructure
23 Nov 2013
Our response considers the questions:
- What role should the Government play in ensuring that there is an effective long-term strategy for meeting future scientific infrastructure needs?
- What impact has removing capital spend from the ring-fenced budget had on investment in scientific infrastructure and should the ring-fenced science budget be redefined to include an element of capital spend?
- If the current funding level is maintained or reduced, what would be the longer term impacts on scientific infrastructure in the UK?
- To what extent do funding structures in the UK help or hinder involvement in EU and international projects, and should the level of UK involvement be improved?
- What impact does publicly funded scientific infrastructure have in terms of supporting innovation and stimulating the UK’s economy?
Download the full response
DownloadRelated resources
What does the new Government mean for R&D?
22 July 2026
CaSE takes a look at what Andy Burnham’s new Government and first announcements could mean for UK R&D
Update on the new UKRI strategy and delivery plan
16 July 2026
UKRI have published a new strategy and delivery plan for the financial year 2026-27. CaSE takes a look at the details.
Significant cuts following STFC prioritisation
09 July 2026
UKRI have published ‘prioritisation’ at the STFC to bring down projected costs, the consequences will be significant cuts to some areas and facilities funded by the STFC.
Scrutinising research policy needs strong sector voices and great journalism
01 July 2026
Clarivate, the parent company of Research Professional News (RPN), announced they are shuttering the prestigious publication at the end of 2026. This is sad news.