House of Lords Reform and Expertise
06 Jul 2012
Science and engineering are vital to the health of the UK’s economy and wider society. Members of the House of Lords must be able to access and deploy expertise in these areas as effectively as possible.
Summary Recommendations
- The proportion of the House of Lords which is appointed should be at least 30 per cent.
- The Appointments Commission should become fully independent and should proactively seek new members, particularly in areas where expertise is found to be lacking.
- The House of Lords and its members should seek to employ more staff with backgrounds in science and engineering, as opposed to predominantly from politics.
- The resources of the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee should be increased – not reduced, as recently proposed.
- The Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology should provide a comprehensive and compulsory induction programme aimed at new members, but also open to existing members, of both Houses.
House of Lords Reform and Expertise
DownloadRelated resources
What does CaSE’s flagship study, Public Attitudes to R&D 2025, tell us about voter attitudes and how they differ? Rebecca Hill takes a look at the evidence and how this will inform CaSE’s new project R&D in a shifting voter landscape.
Analysis of ‘high-level mapping’ of the new UKRI ‘buckets’ system and what they tell us about UK R&D funding.
Following discourse surrounding UKRI’s new funding model and the specific impact of some changes to the STFC, CaSE have written to ask for further clarity on some key areas.
In the last few days CaSE have had multiple opportunities to hear from and have discussions directly with UKRI’s CEO Prof Sir Ian Chapman.