House of Lords Reform and Expertise
06 Jul 2012
Science and engineering are vital to the health of the UK’s economy and wider society. Members of the House of Lords must be able to access and deploy expertise in these areas as effectively as possible.
Summary Recommendations
- The proportion of the House of Lords which is appointed should be at least 30 per cent.
- The Appointments Commission should become fully independent and should proactively seek new members, particularly in areas where expertise is found to be lacking.
- The House of Lords and its members should seek to employ more staff with backgrounds in science and engineering, as opposed to predominantly from politics.
- The resources of the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee should be increased – not reduced, as recently proposed.
- The Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology should provide a comprehensive and compulsory induction programme aimed at new members, but also open to existing members, of both Houses.
House of Lords Reform and Expertise
DownloadRelated resources
Conservative Party have presented a defence policy proposal that includes a reduction of UKRI funding by £2 billion per year. CaSE has looked at this proposal and what it indicates about the wider position of R&D in public policy.
CaSE has received a reply to our letter to the Conservative Shadow Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, Julia Lopez MP, which asked for clarity surrounding their policy position that would see a reduction of UKRI funding by £2 billion per year.
A recap of the updates and discussions surrounding the new UKRI budget framework and a summary of the latest dialogue between UKRI and the House of Commons Science, Innovation and Technology Committee.
CaSE takes a look at what the 2026 manifestos of political parties for the Holyrood and Senedd elections could mean for R&D.